Admin: Fix 5 internal link(s)

2026-03-16T16:28:04Z

Fix 5 internal link(s)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 16 March 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:

	== Recommended Sequence ==		== Recommended Sequence ==
	# Start with [[~~Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Basic 01~~\|EP-Basic-01]] — Establish a baseline for checking AI output		# Start with [[The Fact-Check Habit\|EP-Basic-01]] — Establish a baseline for checking AI output
	# Then [[~~Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Intermediate 01~~\|EP-Intermediate-01]] — Build verification into your workflows		# Then [[The Verification Checklist\|EP-Intermediate-01]] — Build verification into your workflows
	# Then [[~~Exercises/Workflow Automation/Wa Intermediate 01~~\|WA-Intermediate-01]] — Level up automation with ethics baked in		# Then [[The Prompt Chain\|WA-Intermediate-01]] — Level up automation with ethics baked in
	# Stretch: [[~~Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Advanced 01~~\|EP-Advanced-01]] — Design an accountability system		# Stretch: [[The AI Governance Playbook\|EP-Advanced-01]] — Design an accountability system

	== Common Pitfalls ==		== Common Pitfalls ==
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* '''Building trust in AI consistency.''' Because your workflows run smoothly most of the time, you develop false confidence that AI output is reliable. AI fails unpredictably — the 99 correct outputs make the 1 confidently wrong output much more dangerous.		* '''Building trust in AI consistency.''' Because your workflows run smoothly most of the time, you develop false confidence that AI output is reliable. AI fails unpredictably — the 99 correct outputs make the 1 confidently wrong output much more dangerous.
	* '''Confusing "I automate ethically" with "I have ethical habits."''' You may believe your intentions are good (and they probably are), but good intentions without systematic checks produce the same result as no intentions at all. The question isn't whether you care about accuracy — it's whether your processes guarantee it.		* '''Confusing "I automate ethically" with "I have ethical habits."''' You may believe your intentions are good (and they probably are), but good intentions without systematic checks produce the same result as no intentions at all. The question isn't whether you care about accuracy — it's whether your processes guarantee it.
	* '''Resisting the checklist.''' If you're the type who builds systems, using someone else's checklist feels awkward. But [[~~Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Intermediate 01~~\|EP-Intermediate-01]] asks you to build ''your own'' — customized to your work, tested against real outputs, and integrated into your existing workflows.		* '''Resisting the checklist.''' If you're the type who builds systems, using someone else's checklist feels awkward. But [[The Verification Checklist\|EP-Intermediate-01]] asks you to build ''your own'' — customized to your work, tested against real outputs, and integrated into your existing workflows.

	== What Leveling Up Looks Like ==		== What Leveling Up Looks Like ==

Admin: Imported from AI Fluency Playbook

2026-03-16T16:10:14Z

Imported from AI Fluency Playbook

New page

''A pathway for automation-skilled users who need to build stronger verification and ethical judgment habits.''

== Your Profile ==

You're comfortable building AI-assisted workflows but may be moving fast without checking outputs carefully. This pathway helps you build verification habits into your existing automation skills.

== Recommended Sequence ==
# Start with [[Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Basic 01|EP-Basic-01]] — Establish a baseline for checking AI output
# Then [[Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Intermediate 01|EP-Intermediate-01]] — Build verification into your workflows
# Then [[Exercises/Workflow Automation/Wa Intermediate 01|WA-Intermediate-01]] — Level up automation with ethics baked in
# Stretch: [[Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Advanced 01|EP-Advanced-01]] — Design an accountability system

== Common Pitfalls ==
* '''Seeing verification as a speed bump.''' Your automation instinct treats every additional step as overhead. But verification isn't overhead — it's quality assurance. The goal is to make verification ''efficient'', not to eliminate it.
* '''Building trust in AI consistency.''' Because your workflows run smoothly most of the time, you develop false confidence that AI output is reliable. AI fails unpredictably — the 99 correct outputs make the 1 confidently wrong output much more dangerous.
* '''Confusing "I automate ethically" with "I have ethical habits."''' You may believe your intentions are good (and they probably are), but good intentions without systematic checks produce the same result as no intentions at all. The question isn't whether you care about accuracy — it's whether your processes guarantee it.
* '''Resisting the checklist.''' If you're the type who builds systems, using someone else's checklist feels awkward. But [[Exercises/Ethical Prompting/Ep Intermediate 01|EP-Intermediate-01]] asks you to build ''your own'' — customized to your work, tested against real outputs, and integrated into your existing workflows.

== What Leveling Up Looks Like ==
* Every AI workflow you build includes an explicit quality gate — a point where output is checked before it moves forward
* You can classify your AI-assisted tasks by risk level and apply appropriate verification standards (not everything gets the same scrutiny — but nothing gets zero scrutiny)
* You catch AI errors ''before'' they reach stakeholders, not after
* You've built a personal verification checklist and it's become habit — you use it without thinking about it
* When you design a new automation, your default question is "where should the human check go?" rather than "how do I eliminate all human steps?"

[[Category:AI Fluency Playbook]]
[[Category:Learning Pathways]]

Pathway: High Automation, Low Ethics - Revision history

Admin: Fix 5 internal link(s)

Admin: Imported from AI Fluency Playbook