Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
AI Fluency Playbook
Getting Started
How to Use
Core Content
Five Pillars
Exercises
Concepts
Learning Profiles
Archetypes
Pathways
Reference
Resources
Glossary
Tools
Further Reading
GW AI Fluency Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Your First AI Team Meeting
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== π§ Jump in (Tinkerers start here) == Pick a real decision you're currently facing. It could be a work decision, a project direction, or a problem you're stuck on. Paste this prompt into any AI chat (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini β anything works): <blockquote> I want you to act as two different experts giving me advice on '''[your problem here]'''. First, respond as a '''[Role A]''' β someone who focuses on '''[their priority]'''. Then, respond as a '''[Role B]''' β someone who focuses on '''[their different priority]'''. Keep each perspective clearly labeled. Be specific and give concrete recommendations, not vague advice. </blockquote> '''Example β choosing whether to launch a feature now or wait:''' <blockquote> I want you to act as two different experts giving me advice on whether to launch our new onboarding flow this week or wait until next month. First, respond as a '''growth-focused product manager''' β someone who prioritizes user acquisition and speed to market. Then, respond as a '''risk-aware QA lead''' β someone who prioritizes stability, edge cases, and user trust. Keep each perspective clearly labeled. Be specific and give concrete recommendations, not vague advice. </blockquote> After reading both perspectives, send this follow-up: <blockquote> Now, act as a '''neutral facilitator'''. Summarize where these two experts agree, where they disagree, and what the key trade-off is. End with a single question I should answer before making my decision. </blockquote> Read the synthesis. Notice how one prompt gave you a structured debate that would normally require two people in a room. ----
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to GW AI Fluency Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
GW AI Fluency Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)